Hosting Tutorial & Guide

SiteGround VS BlueHost on the Quality of Shared Hosting Service

updated on Nov 16, 2016
SiteGround VS BlueHost on the Quality of Shared Hosting Service To ensure that the comparison between SiteGround and BlueHost is real and impartial, we have personally reviewed the shared hosting services from both companies on price, feature, uptime, speed, technical support and some other important factors.

Based on our comprehensive editorial reviews, the monitored performance of the sample site hosted on SiteGround StartUp and BlueHost Plus, and verified customer reviews, we have given detailed ratings to the 2 companies. Read detailed information in the following table.

Editorial Rating about SiteGround and BlueHost

In fact both of these two web hosts are the award-winning options that have a large customer base for a long time. SiteGround has been founded since the year of 2004. At present, they simply grow to be a large company that has more than 280 staffs and the number continues increasing.

BlueHost is the leading web hosts that have been recommended by a large number of webmasters and review sites. They focus on the cost-effective hosting service with the peak performance and responsive support service.

To be frank, choosing between them can be tough. In this case, we have started the editorial rating in the very beginning after trying their services personally. Personally, we think BlueHost gives us the better hosting experiences than SiteGround.

RatingSiteGroundBlueHost
Price
Feature
Loading Speed
Uptime
Support
Customer Reviews0957
Customer RatingN/A
Recommended
Read MoreNot RecommendedBlueHost Review

Package & Price

Price Currently, SiteGround has 3 shared packages named StartUp, GrowBig and GoGeek. As up to 60% discounts are offered by the company by default, the effective price of the packages starts from $3.95/mo, which is quite affordable. However, it is noticeable that the regular price starts from $9.95/mo, $14.95/mo and $29.95/mo, which is not so reasonable in the shared hosting field.

In addition, SiteGround only accepts payments via 2 kinds of credit cards – Visa and MasterCard, which is too limited and inconvenient for people who require other popular payment methods like American Express and PayPal. Moreover, the company charges additional $14.95/mo setup fee for monthly billing customers.

Being different, BlueHost has three shared hosting packages, including Basic, Plus and Prime. With up to 64% discount available for subscribers going through this promotional link, the packages are starting at $2.95/mo, while the regular price of the former one starts from $7.99/mo, much lower than that of the latter.

For the sake of both convenience and security, BlueHost gives support to not only credit cards (Visa, MasterCard, Discover and American Express), but also PayPal. Apart from that, the plans include 1 free domain and free marketing credits for Google, Facebook and Twitter.

BlueHost Promotional Link Activation

Feature

Feature In terms of features, the shared packages from SiteGround and BlueHost share a lot of similarities. For instance, both companies provide unlimited bandwidth, unlimited number of databases, 1 free domain name, 99.9% uptime guarantee, and cPanel control panel.

However, when we compare the features in detail, we found that StartUp lags behind in many aspects, such as the amount of disk space, the number of hosted domains, and the support for Ruby on Rails. See detailed comparison in the following table.

FeatureSiteGroundBlueHostBlueHost
Plan in ComparisonStartUpBasicPlus
Free Domain
Disk Space10 GB50 GBUnlimited
BandwidthUnlimitedUnlimitedUnlimited
Hosted Domains11Unlimited
Control PanelcPanelcPanelcPanel
1-Click InstallerSoftaculousSimpleScriptsSimpleScripts
PHP 5
MySQL 5
PostgreSQL
SSH
Perl
Ruby on Rails
Marketing Offers$200
Money Back Guarantee30 DaysAnytimeAnytime
Regular Price$9.95/mo$7.99/mo$10.99/mo
Discount60%63%64%
Current Price$3.95/mo$2.95/mo$3.95/mo
How to Claim-Link ActivationLink Activation

Uptime & Speed

Performance SiteGround uses 3 data centers in Chicago, IL, Amsterdam NL, and Singapore, SG, and equips them with high quality hardware, custom-optimized server configuration and a high level of power redundancy. All of the data centers feature multiple power feeds and their own generators. The company guarantees 99.9% uptime, and our real-time monitoring results in an average of 99.91% uptime in the past half a year.

BlueHost also has 3 data centers which are self-built and maintained. Knowing what customers need, the company builds its own servers from the ground up with a large investment of millions of USD to deliver the best possible performance. Besides, the data centers also feature UPS power and a backup generator. The monitored uptime of this company is as the following chart.

As for speed, both of the companies utilize a self-development account isolation technology and CloudFlare CDN to deliver the fastest speed possible. As the monitoring statistics show, the server response speed of SiteGround averages 509ms, and that of BlueHost averages 320ms in the past month, more than 50% faster. Read the real-time monitoring results of BlueHost in the following chart.

Technical Support

Technical Support The quality of technical support is a crucial factor in choosing web host because there are unexpected issues happening now and then. Fortunately, both SiteGround and BlueHost offer top-notch support via phone, email and live chat on a 24x7 basis, which is quite helpful.

The difference in this aspect lies in the response time for support requests. We have personally tried all the communication channels offered by the 2 companies and got the conclusion that the holding time of BlueHost is approximately 30% shorter than that of SiteGround.

Which Company Offers the Better Shared Hosting Service?

The answer is BlueHost, certainly, as this company has the same reliability but surpasses its competitor a lot in price, feature and speed. The anytime money back guarantee, at the same time, makes the service worry-free. Moreover, this company has maintained a high reputation.