Hosting Tutorial & Guide

Media Temple VS BlueHost – In-Depth Comparison Between the 2 Top Brands

updated on Mar 30, 2017
Media Temple VS BlueHost – In-Depth Comparison Between the 2 Top Brands In below, we have worked out a comprehensive comparison between the shared hosting services from Media Temple and BlueHost to make clear which company is the better Linux hosting provider. This comparison is written from several aspects, including price, feature, reliability, performance and technical support.

We have been hosting 2 WordPress websites of the same size on the shared platform of the 2 companies, and kept monitoring the sites closely with a 5-minute interval. In addition, we have browsed thousands of verified reviews to learn the real customers' voice. Besides, based on our experience and the verified reviews, we have developed the rankings of the compared services on some important factors. Read the following table for detailed information.

RatingMedia TempleBlueHost
Loading Speed
Customer Rating
Read MoreMedia Temple ReviewBlueHost Review

Plans & Price

Media Temple VS BlueHost- PriceHaving been in the industry for more than 15 years, Media Temple is followed by millions of webmasters around the world. This company has released multiple kinds of Linux hosting service to enable customers to choose the proper one according their current budget and needs, among which the shared hosting plan is named as Grid Plan and priced at $20/mo, which is as expensive as a VPS plan.

If users choose an annual payment term, they can save $40 to $60 per year. Payment can be made by credit card only and a 30-day money back guarantee is available.

Founded in 2002, BlueHost has been recognized as one of the largest shared hosting providers, providing 3 shared Linux hosting solution named as Basic, Plus and Prime with the regular prices of $7.99/mo, $10.99/mo and $14.99/mo. Now, the company is offering up to 63% discount for customers going through the promotional link below, with which the price is low to $2.95/mo. Furthermore, this plan includes a free domain name for 1 year and advertising credits.

What's more, the provider offers 30 days full money back guarantee and anytime prorated money back guarantee, which enables customers to ask for a full refund if they want to cancel their accounts in the first 30 days, and a prorated refund after that period. In addition, BlueHost supports both credit cards and PayPal. Therefore, the purchase is totally worry-free, easy and secure.

BlueHost Promotional Link Activation


Both Media Temple and BlueHost provide a 1-click script installer for customers to install popular applications with a few clicks, in less than 1 minute. Furthermore, both of the 2 companies offer Perl, PHP, Python, Apache and MySQL. However, they have a lot of differences. The most significant one is about control panel: Media Temple uses AccountCenter, while BlueHost adopts cPanel.

Although the Grid plan is a shared plan by nature, it is more like a VPS plan in terms of hosting features – the resources are limited and most tools are optional and paid. For example, Grid users need to pay $15/yr for domain registration and $75/yr for SSL Certificate.

In below, we have made a comparison table to list the main features of the Grid, Basic and Plus to help our readers know more about the packages.

Plan In ReviewGridBasicPlus
Disk Space100 GB50 GBUnlimited
Hosted Websites1001Unlimited
Monthly Data Transfer1 TBUnlimitedUnlimited
Email Accounts1,0005Unlimited
Shared SSL
Money Back Guarantee30 DaysAnytimeAnytime
Regular Price$20/mo$7.99/mo$10.99/mo
Effective Price$20/mo$2.95/mo$5.45/mo
How to Claim-Link ActivationLink Activation

Reliability & Performance

Media Temple VS BlueHost- ReliabilityAll hosting servers are under Media Temple's direct control at all times in their secure, sate-of-the-art East and West data centers that are equipped with hundreds of high performance servers, N+2 redundancy backup power, N+2 redundant cooling system, 24x7 armed security, 24x7 monitored fire suppression, 48" raised floor and dozens of diesel generators. All the top-rating facilities have achieved a satisfying uptime.

BlueHost has invested more than 20 million dollars in their 3 first-class data centers in Utah. In the data centers, they use high performance servers developed by themselves, UPS, many diesel generators. Moreover, technicians and engineers are monitoring the data centers and servers 24x7, so that they are able to find and resolve any sudden issue as soon as it arises. Therefore, the hosted websites are protected from any unexpected interruption.

According to our monitoring result, in the last 6 months, Media Temple uptime is 99.96% on average, while that of its competitor is 99.99%. Read the following statistics chart for the real-time BlueHost uptime of the past 30 days.

Media Temple claims to build the Grid around shared clusters of server hardware so that users always have access to sufficient resources. It also offers performance-boosting technologies such as FastCGI to accelerate page loading speed. However, it seems that FastCGI does not help much because many current users are complaining about slow performance in Media Temple Forum.

This is not the case with BlueHost. We have been hosting several websites on BlueHost Plus and are quiet satisfied with its performance so far. Based on our real hosting experience, we know this company truly uses the best hardware such as 16-Core AMD Opteron and smart software like CloudFlare for excellent performance. We’ve monitored its server response time in the past month as reflected in the chart below.

Technical Support

Media Temple VS BlueHost - SupportThe 2 companies allow customers to contact them through live chat, email and toll-phone call 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. All the support staffs are professional, so that they are capable of providing instant assistance for customers to deal with hosting issues. In addition, the companies offer useful help through forums.

Besides the support methods mentioned before, Media Temple and BlueHost both provide quality help through knowledgebase, in which technicians and engineers have worked out a pile of in-depth articles and video tutorials, designed to teach customers how to deal with common issues independently.

However, we have found that the replies given by BlueHost are more helpful. For example, when a Grid user complains about a serious downtime, he/she is often advised to migrate to a VPS plan, which is much more expensive. When a BlueHost customer reports any performance issues, he/she will get precise answers as to what goes wrong and get problems solved timely.


From all the aspects we have reviewed above, we can learn that the 2 companies both offer rich-featured, user-friendly, reliable and fast shared hosting service. In addition, they both provide a high level of technical support to enable customers to concentrate on business without any distraction. Therefore, they are both trust-worthy. However, the service from BlueHost is much affordable than that of its competitor. So it is should be the better choice.