Hosting Tutorial & Guide

Fatcow VS GoDaddy – Which Wins in Shared Hosting?

updated on Mar 25, 2016
Fatcow VS GoDaddy – Which Wins in Shared Hosting? Having been in industry for no less than 10 years, Fatcow and GoDaddy are two providers of shared hosting which devote to offering satisfactory hosting service. But it is hard to make a definite choice as those two companies share a lot of similarities in their packages and webmasters always in a dilemma under this circumstance.

Thus, to respond to the puzzlements mentioned above, we make out the comparison of those two companies which aims to clarify the similarities and differences between them, and to reveal which company is more competitive in shared hosting service. Besides, this comprehensive review is based on real customer reviews and our effortless monitoring results, which include editorial ratings, price, control panel, performance, uptime and support.

Editorial Ratings

Since 1998, Fatcow has been offering shared hosting services. However, after so many years, the company is gaining decreasing ratings on the ease of use, performance and support. As for GoDaddy, it has not been spoken highly of since the first day it started to offer hosting services. The most important reason for this is the slow speed.

In order to make a further look at the performance of the 2 providers, we'd like to show the following elaborately-made ratings on the two companies' overall value, control panel, loading speed, reliability, and support.

PlanFatcow PlanEconomy
Control Panel
Loading Speed
Customer ReviewsFatcow reviewGoDaddy review


Fatcow VS GoDaddy - Price Fatcow offers one all-in-one package to cater to the demands of small businesses and personal websites. At present, people who are signing up for this package are capable of getting a half-price sale for $49/year which averages $4.08/mo. Note that $200 advertising credits and free business listing on are endowed.

Comparatively, GoDaddy supplies customers with Economy, Deluxe and Ultimate packages which start from $3.99/mo, $4.49/mo and $7.49/mo with almost 50% discount off the initial price of $6.99/mo, $8.99/mo and $14.99/mo respectively. In terms of its extras, the packages have $100 Google advertising credits.

Control Panel

The control panel offered by Fatcow is a custom one which has been tested to be feature rich but not user-friendly. The interface is said to be rather slow, and a simple action can take over 5 seconds to complete. Besides, the design does not seem to keep pace with the modern trends. Once Fatcow utilized vDeck which is somewhat better than the custom control panel, but now this control panel is no longer a choice.

Compared with Fatcow, GoDaddy adopts cPanel which is easy-to-use and has clean and user-friendly interface for users to quickly create and manage their own information. For other differences which lie in the hosting features of those two companies, read the following table.

For a better understanding, we will also take the Launch plan offered by InMotion for further comparison.

PlanFatcow PlanEconomyLaunch
Operating SystemLinuxLinux/WindowsLinux
Control PanelvDeckcPanelcPanel
Free Domain Name
Ruby on Rails
Email AddressesUnlimited100Unlimited
Custom Cron Jobs
24/7 Live chat support
Money-Back Guarantee30 Days30 Days90 Days
Regular Price$10.95/mo$6.99/mo$6.99/mo
Special Offer$4.08/mo$3.99/mo$3.49/mo
Claim the OfferLink ActivationLink ActivationLink Activation

Performance & Uptime

By utilizing 100% wind-powered data centers which are totally eco-friendly, Fatcow promises to offer customers high-quality and satisfying performance. Likewise, GoDaddy guarantees fast page loading speed with its award-winning data center. As a result, according to our monitoring and testing results, we reach the conclusion that the average response time of Fatcow is about 700ms, and relatively the average response time of GoDaddy is approximately 800ms.

Moreover, Fatcow and GoDaddy work to deliver stable and reliable hosting service for webmasters and they both firmly guarantee at least 99.9% uptime for their customers. To check whether the two companies fulfill their promises or not, we keep close eyes on their servers' uptime for a long time. And we also find that the average uptime of Fatcow is 99.92% and the average uptime of GoDaddy is 99.94%.


Fatcow VS GoDaddy - Support The two companies both own well-trained and talented support teams which have gained many praises and acknowledgements. What's more, perhaps one of the most obvious disparities between the two companies is that Fatcow allows its users to get access to the support team via email, phone call and live chat free of any limitation, whereas GoDaddy just permits users to seek for help through email and phone call. To some degree, it means that people hosting websites with GoDaddy can't get quick and prompt help when they are faced with some unexpected and urgent problems.

Pros and Cons of Fatcow Web Hosting

In this section, we would like to summarize the pros and cons of Fatcow to make sure a better understanding and an easier choice.


  • Fatcow Plan, the unlimited domain hosting plan, costs $4.08/mo only for the initial term, which makes it quite affordable.
  • Fatcow provides a free domain for one year, and $200 advertising credits.
  • Daily server backups are available for guaranteeing the data security.


  • The renewal prices of Fatcow Plan are expensive. A 1-year plan renews at $12.95/mo.
  • SSH is not supported on the shared servers.
  • The control panel is not good to use, and slow.
  • The hosting speed is slow, too.

Pros and Cons of GoDaddy Web Hosting

GoDaddy has some similarities with Fatcow. However, there are even more differences. For example, the renewal prices are lower. Below are more details.


  • The unlimited domain hosting plan is affordable, purchasable at $4.49/mo only for the first term. Renewals, which start at $8.99/mo, are still cheaper than the prices of Fatcow Plan.
  • Additional CPU, memory and more can be purchased at any time to deal with usage spikes.
  • cPanel is offered to guarantee a good hosting experience.
  • The reliability, which is backed by CloudLinux, CageFS and some other technologies, is good.


  • The speed of the company's servers is too slow.
  • Technical support is not offered through live chat.
  • Too many complaints can be found on the Internet.

Conclusion - Which Wins in Shared Hosting?

In conclusion, it's hard to say which company wins in shared hosting as both of them have too many drawbacks in the service offerings. For webmasters chasing for rich-featured hosting service with affordable price and reliable system, we have the following alternative choices.