Hosting Tutorial & Guide

Concrete5 VS WordPress – Which Is the More Easy-to-Use Open Source CMS?

updated on Jul 01, 2015
Concrete5 VS WordPress – Which Is the More Easy-to-Use Open Source CMS? Concrete5 and WordPress are recognized as 2 of the most popular software due to their rich features. However, which is more easy-to-use. To make it clear, we started to use them to build 2 websites with same size, and kept monitoring the sites closely. Besides, we have browsed thousands of verified feedbacks to learn how other users think about the applications.

Based on our personal experience and the information we collected, we have worked out a comprehensive comparison between the 2 content management systems from setup, plugins, themes and SEO.


In this aspect, both Concrete5 and WordPress provide a very easy way by which webmasters even those with little hosting knowledge are able to set up an account and a website. In addition, the admin panels integrated with the 2 software are easy to manipulate, which enables users to add media, pages and plugins through their personal dashboard and change files without FTP.


Concrete5 VS WordPress - PluginsGenerally, plugins are used to save time and add a certain bit of functionality to the CMS. In Concrete5, the plugin repository is small. However, this company has managed to find a work-around multiple features that allow users to tweak their post editor from the CMS itself, without installing further plugins. Likewise, sitemap and RSS feeds are provided within the CMS, which makes users combine abstraction with customization.

On the other hand, there are a huge number of plugins for WordPress. This is also regarded as its main advantage. However, this application was built to manage blogs and gradually evolved by the usage of plugins. The problem is that many plugins conflict with each other because they are not tested together or maintained as this CMS gets updated. In addition, some developers may leave their users with a site stick in a WordPress black hole which prevents them from upgrading and having access to new features.

What's more, another question is that the application users have to seek out and install the suitable plugins themselves. In this case, they need to refer to some helpful articles in the professional review websites. As far as we know, besides our website, there are a pile of useful articles about WordPress plugins at WhatsWP.


In addition to plugins, add-ons and themes are 2 another important factors that can make webmasters sites come to life. As for add-ons, both applications are good. However, when it comes to themes, WordPress wins with a pool of optional themes that can be easily downloaded and used easily. On the other hand, with Concrete5, webmasters only have a few themes to use. Therefore, they need to hire a professional designer to help them develop a suitable theme to apply to their websites.


Concrete5 VS WordPress - SEOThe most important thing about building websites is to make the sites SEO friendly, if the webmasters want to use the sites to make money. On this front, helping users focus more on adding content instead of worrying about the technicalities of setting up a site, WordPress beats the other one by providing the best opportunities for webmasters to do proper SEO.

As for Concrete5, it also offers SEO compatibilities but not as much as the other one does. Nevertheless, if you want to set up a website with galleries or complex categories, you should go for it.


Generally speaking, both content management systems are powerful for hosting websites and meet users' needs. To be specific, Concret5 is more suitable for professional designers because it is more customizable than its competitor, while due to the quantities of free themes and plugins, WordPress is the better choice for webmasters who want to build a specific website to make money without paying much.

No matter which CMS webmasters choose to build their websites, they need a reliable web host. However, the vast options on the market make it difficult to choose a suitable one. In these years, we have reviewed hundreds of hosting plans and collected thousands of real customer reviews. As a result, we found that the packages from the following companies are several of the best for webmasters to build websites with the 2 applications.

Learn more details of the selected solutions in this table.